↓ Skip to main content

Direct and up-close views of plant cell walls show a leading role for lignin-modifying enzymes on ensuing xylanases

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 539)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct and up-close views of plant cell walls show a leading role for lignin-modifying enzymes on ensuing xylanases
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13068-014-0176-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dragica Jeremic, Robyn E Goacher, Ruoyu Yan, Chithra Karunakaran, Emma R Master

Abstract

A key barrier that limits the full potential of biological processes to create new, sustainable materials and fuels from plant fibre is limited enzyme accessibility to polysaccharides and lignin that characterize lignocellulose networks. Moreover, the heterogeneity of lignocellulosic substrates means that different enzyme combinations might be required for efficient transformation of different plant resources. Analytical techniques with high chemical sensitivity and spatial resolution that permit direct characterization of solid samples could help overcome these challenges by allowing direct visualization of enzyme action within plant fibre, thereby identify barriers to enzyme action.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Indonesia 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 25%
Engineering 10 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 13%
Chemistry 5 8%
Chemical Engineering 4 7%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#526,565
of 6,810,016 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels
#32
of 539 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,654
of 228,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels
#3
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,810,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 539 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.