↓ Skip to main content

Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the suspicion of pancreatic metastases

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the suspicion of pancreatic metastases
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-230x-13-63
Pubmed ID
Authors

José Celso Ardengh, César Vivian Lopes, Rafael Kemp, Filadélfio Venco, Eder Rios de Lima-Filho, José Sebastião dos Santos

Abstract

Metastases to the pancreas are rare, and usually mistaken for primary pancreatic cancers. This study aimed to describe the histology results of solid pancreatic tumours obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for diagnosis of metastases to the pancreas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 19%
Other 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 11 30%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 54%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#20,247,117
of 22,775,504 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#1,361
of 1,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,227
of 199,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#35
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,775,504 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.