↓ Skip to main content

China’s role as a global health donor in Africa: what can we learn from studying under reported resource flows?

Overview of attention for article published in Globalization and Health, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
China’s role as a global health donor in Africa: what can we learn from studying under reported resource flows?
Published in
Globalization and Health, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12992-014-0084-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen A Grépin, Victoria Y Fan, Gordon C Shen, Lucy Chen

Abstract

BackgroundThere is a growing recognition of China¿s role as a global health donor, in particular in Africa, but there have been few systematic studies of the level, destination, trends, or composition of these development finance flows or a comparison of China¿s engagement as a donor with that of more traditional global health donors.MethodsUsing newly released data from AidData on China¿s development finance activities in Africa, developed to track under reported resource flows, we identified 255 health, population, water, and sanitation (HPWS) projects from 2000¿2012, which we descriptively analyze by activity sector, recipient country, project type, and planned activity. We compare China¿s activities to projects from traditional donors using data from the OECD¿s Development Assistance Committee (DAC) Creditor Reporting System.ResultsSince 2000, China increased the number of HPWS projects it supported in Africa and health has increased as a development priority for China. China¿s contributions are large, ranking it among the top 10 bilateral global health donors to Africa. Over 50% of the HPWS projects target infrastructure, 40% target human resource development, and the provision of equipment and drugs is also common. Malaria is an important disease priority but HIV is not. We find little evidence that China targets health aid preferentially to natural resource rich countries.ConclusionsChina is an important global health donor to Africa but contrasts with traditional DAC donors through China¿s focus on health system inputs and on malaria. Although better data are needed, particularly through more transparent aid data reporting across ministries and agencies, China¿s approach to South-South cooperation represents an important and distinct source of financial assistance for health in Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 125 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Researcher 8 6%
Other 8 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 28 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 21%
Social Sciences 21 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 7%
Arts and Humanities 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Other 27 21%
Unknown 29 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,464,046
of 25,925,760 outputs
Outputs from Globalization and Health
#212
of 1,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,965
of 362,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Globalization and Health
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,925,760 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.