You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Socioeconomic gradient in consumption of whole fruit and 100% fruit juice among US children and adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-14-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adam Drewnowski, Colin D Rehm |
| Abstract |
The consumption of fruit is generally associated with better health, but also higher socioeconomic status (SES). Most previous studies evaluating consumption of fruits have not separated 100% fruit juice and whole fruit, which may conceal interesting patterns in consumption. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 5 | 42% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 121 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 19% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 39 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2016.
All research outputs
#304,188
of 22,776,824 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#97
of 1,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,035
of 352,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,776,824 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.