↓ Skip to main content

Primary cardiac tumors in children: a center’s experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary cardiac tumors in children: a center’s experience
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13019-016-0448-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liyang Ying, Ru Lin, Zhan Gao, Jianchuan Qi, Zewei Zhang, Weizhong Gu

Abstract

Cardiac tumors which may induce sudden death are rare entities with an autopsy frequency of 0.001-0.030 %. This study aims to analyze the characteristics and outcome of pediatric patients with primary cardiac tumors treated in our center. Sixteen patients with primary cardiac tumors treated at our center between January 2000 and December 2014 were included into this retrospective review. The patients' age ranged from 1 day to 13 years (mean age, 46 months), with weight ranging from 3.2 to 45 kg (mean weight 17.5 kg). All patients were diagnosed by echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. We did complete resection of the mass in 15 patients with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), whereas partial resection was done in one patient. Fifteen children recovered well, and one patient died of low cardiac output syndrome at 5 days after operation. Rhabdomyoma was the most frequent tumor type, followed by myxoma, fibroma, hemangioma; No malignant tumors were found. Echocardiography has provided consistent assessment of anatomy and function. Complete surgical resection is valuable treatment for cardiac mass when detected even in asymptomatic patients. Rhabdomyoma is the most frequent tumor type, followed by myxoma and fibroma.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 14%
Other 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,734,518
of 23,523,017 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#155
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,929
of 302,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,523,017 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.