↓ Skip to main content

Predicting sequence and structural specificities of RNA binding regions recognized by splicing factor SRSF1

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting sequence and structural specificities of RNA binding regions recognized by splicing factor SRSF1
Published in
BMC Genomics, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-12-s5-s8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Wang, Liran Juan, Junjie Lv, Kejun Wang, Jeremy R Sanford, Yunlong Liu

Abstract

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play diverse roles in eukaryotic RNA processing. Despite their pervasive functions in coding and noncoding RNA biogenesis and regulation, elucidating the sequence specificities that define protein-RNA interactions remains a major challenge. Recently, CLIP-seq (Cross-linking immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing) has been successfully implemented to study the transcriptome-wide binding patterns of SRSF1, PTBP1, NOVA and fox2 proteins. These studies either adopted traditional methods like Multiple EM for Motif Elicitation (MEME) to discover the sequence consensus of RBP's binding sites or used Z-score statistics to search for the overrepresented nucleotides of a certain size. We argue that most of these methods are not well-suited for RNA motif identification, as they are unable to incorporate the RNA structural context of protein-RNA interactions, which may affect to binding specificity. Here, we describe a novel model-based approach--RNAMotifModeler to identify the consensus of protein-RNA binding regions by integrating sequence features and RNA secondary structures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 91 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 28%
Researcher 17 18%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 11 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 20%
Computer Science 5 5%
Engineering 4 4%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,508,296
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#2,905
of 10,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,043
of 244,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#77
of 297 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,702 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 297 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.