↓ Skip to main content

A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation and d-cycloserine for individuals with bipolar disorder

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation and d-cycloserine for individuals with bipolar disorder
Published in
BMC Psychology, October 2014
DOI 10.1186/s40359-014-0041-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas JK Breitborde, Spencer C Dawson, Cindy Woolverton, David Dawley, Emily K Bell, Kaila Norman, Angelina Polsinelli, Beth Bernstein, Pamela Mirsky, Christine Pletkova, Felix Grucci, Carly Montoya, Bernard Nanadiego, Ehsan Sarabi, Michael DePalma, Francisco Moreno

Abstract

Cognitive remediation (CR) has shown significant promise in addressing the cognitive deficits that accompany serious mental illness. However, this intervention does not appear to completely ameliorate the cognitive deficits that accompany these illnesses. D-cycloserine (DCS), an NMDA receptor partial agonist, has been shown to enhance the therapeutic benefits of learning-based psychosocial interventions for psychiatric disorders. Thus, the goal of this study is to examine the utility of combining cognitive remediation and d-cycloserine in the treatment of cognitive deficits among individuals with bipolar disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 23%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 11 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2015.
All research outputs
#14,556,488
of 25,505,015 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychology
#650
of 1,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,050
of 268,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychology
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,505,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.