↓ Skip to main content

Landscape ethnoecological knowledge base and management of ecosystem services in a Székely-Hungarian pre-capitalistic village system (Transylvania, Romania)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Landscape ethnoecological knowledge base and management of ecosystem services in a Székely-Hungarian pre-capitalistic village system (Transylvania, Romania)
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-11-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zsolt Molnár, Krisztina Gellény, Katalin Margóczi, Marianna Biró

Abstract

Previous studies often showed an in-depth ecological understanding by traditional people of managing natural resources. We studied the landscape ethnoecological knowledge (LEEK) of Szekely villagers on the basis of 16-19th century village laws. We analyzed the habitat types, ecosystem services and sustainable management types on which village laws had focused.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 109 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Professor 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 32 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 19%
Social Sciences 9 8%
Arts and Humanities 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 28 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2015.
All research outputs
#5,632,601
of 18,883,809 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#268
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,056
of 325,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,883,809 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.