↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the social vulnerability to malaria in Rwanda

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the social vulnerability to malaria in Rwanda
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-14-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean-Pierre Bizimana, Emmanuel Twarabamenye, Stefan Kienberger

Abstract

Since 2004, malaria interventions in Rwanda have resulted in substantial decline of malaria incidence. However, this achievement is fragile as potentials for local malaria transmissions remain. The risk of getting malaria infection is partially explained by social conditions of vulnerable populations. Since vulnerability to malaria is both influenced by social and environmental factors, its complexity cannot be measured by a single value. The aim of this paper is, therefore, to apply a composite indicator approach for assessing social vulnerability to malaria in Rwanda. This assessment informs the decision-makers in targeting malaria interventions and allocating limited resources to reduce malaria burden in Rwanda.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mali 1 <1%
Unknown 279 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 13%
Researcher 36 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 8%
Other 16 6%
Other 60 21%
Unknown 57 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 20%
Social Sciences 33 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 10%
Environmental Science 20 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 7%
Other 59 21%
Unknown 69 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2015.
All research outputs
#3,132,203
of 24,580,204 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#696
of 5,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,007
of 362,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#14
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,580,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.