↓ Skip to main content

Double tagging clarifies post-release fate of great hammerheads (Sphyrna mokarran)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Double tagging clarifies post-release fate of great hammerheads (Sphyrna mokarran)
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40317-017-0143-x
Authors

J. Marcus Drymon, R. J. David Wells

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 53%
Environmental Science 7 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,059,630
of 17,583,573 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#65
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,307
of 418,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,583,573 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.