You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Selective impairment of methylation maintenance is the major cause of DNA methylation reprogramming in the early embryo
|
---|---|
Published in |
Epigenetics & Chromatin, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-8935-8-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Julia Arand, Mark Wossidlo, Konstantin Lepikhov, Julian R Peat, Wolf Reik, Jörn Walter |
Abstract |
DNA methylomes are extensively reprogrammed during mouse pre-implantation and early germ cell development. The main feature of this reprogramming is a genome-wide decrease in 5-methylcytosine (5mC). Standard high-resolution single-stranded bisulfite sequencing techniques do not allow discrimination of the underlying passive (replication-dependent) or active enzymatic mechanisms of 5mC loss. We approached this problem by generating high-resolution deep hairpin bisulfite sequencing (DHBS) maps, allowing us to follow the patterns of symmetric DNA methylation at CpGs dyads on both DNA strands over single replications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
United States | 5 | 36% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
Scientists | 5 | 36% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 114 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 25% |
Researcher | 27 | 23% |
Student > Master | 18 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
Other | 15 | 13% |
Unknown | 13 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 43% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 30% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Unknown | 14 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,067,441
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#58
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,523
of 358,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.