↓ Skip to main content

Rectal artemisinins for malaria: a review of efficacy and safety from individual patient data in clinical studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rectal artemisinins for malaria: a review of efficacy and safety from individual patient data in clinical studies
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-8-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melba Gomes, Isabela Ribeiro, Marian Warsame, Harin Karunajeewa, Max Petzold

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 18%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 19%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#7,542,364
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,585
of 7,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,672
of 81,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,722 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.