↓ Skip to main content

Association between metabolic syndrome and knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between metabolic syndrome and knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12891-017-1890-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dong-xing Xie, Jie Wei, Chao Zeng, Tuo Yang, Hui Li, Yi-lun Wang, Hui-zhong Long, Zi-ying Wu, Yu-xuan Qian, Kang-hua Li, Guang-hua Lei

Abstract

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent chronic joint disease in China. The aim of this study was to examine the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and knee OA in a population-based Chinese study. Data included in this analysis is from a cross-sectional study, i.e., the Xiangya Hospital Health Management Center Study. MetS was diagnosed according to the criteria defined by the Chinese Diabetes Society. Radiographic knee OA was defined as changes equivalent to Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade 2 or above at least one side. Associations between MetS and its components with OA were evaluated by conducting multivariable adjusted logistic regression. A total of 5764 participants were included in the present study. The unadjusted OR (1.27, 95%CI: 1.10-1.47, P = 0.001), age-sex adjusted OR (1.17, 95%CI: 1.01-1.36, P = 0.041) and multivariable adjusted OR (1.17, 95%CI: 1.01-1.36, P = 0.043) all suggested a positive association between MetS and knee OA. Besides, its components (e.g., overweight, hypertension and dyslipidemia) were also associated with the prevalence of radiographic knee OA respectively, after adjusting for some confounding factors. In addition, with the accumulation of MetS components, the prevalence of knee OA increased. Furthermore, MetS as a whole was associated with the prevalence of knee osteophyte (OSP) (OR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.42-2.09, P < 0.001), but not joint space narrowing (JSN) (OR = 1.06, 95%CI: 0.91-1.23, P = 0.449). The findings of the present study indicated that there was a positive association between the prevalence of MetS and knee OA. However, MetS as a whole was associated with the higher prevalence of knee OSP, but not JSN, which should shed light on our understanding the association between MetS and OA.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 25 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 27 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,557,505
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,417
of 4,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#259,761
of 444,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#56
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.