↓ Skip to main content

Whole genome de novo assemblies of three divergent strains of rice, Oryza sativa, document novel gene space of aus and indica

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Whole genome de novo assemblies of three divergent strains of rice, Oryza sativa, document novel gene space of aus and indica
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13059-014-0506-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael C Schatz, Lyza G Maron, Joshua C Stein, Alejandro Hernandez Wences, James Gurtowski, Eric Biggers, Hayan Lee, Melissa Kramer, Eric Antoniou, Elena Ghiban, Mark H Wright, Jer-ming Chia, Doreen Ware, Susan R McCouch, W Richard McCombie

Abstract

The use of high throughput genome-sequencing technologies has uncovered a large extent of structural variation in eukaryotic genomes that makes important contributions to genomic diversity and phenotypic variation. When the genomes of different strains of a given organism are compared, whole genome resequencing data are typically aligned to an established reference sequence. However, when the reference differs in significant structural ways from the individuals under study, the analysis is often incomplete or inaccurate.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Philippines 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 193 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 24%
Researcher 49 24%
Student > Master 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 26 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 114 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 20%
Computer Science 9 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 <1%
Arts and Humanities 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 33 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,865,614
of 19,140,651 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#1,702
of 3,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,115
of 328,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#25
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,140,651 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,801 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.