You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Whole genome de novo assemblies of three divergent strains of rice, Oryza sativa, document novel gene space of aus and indica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-014-0506-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael C Schatz, Lyza G Maron, Joshua C Stein, Alejandro Hernandez Wences, James Gurtowski, Eric Biggers, Hayan Lee, Melissa Kramer, Eric Antoniou, Elena Ghiban, Mark H Wright, Jer-ming Chia, Doreen Ware, Susan R McCouch, W Richard McCombie |
| Abstract |
The use of high throughput genome-sequencing technologies has uncovered a large extent of structural variation in eukaryotic genomes that makes important contributions to genomic diversity and phenotypic variation. When the genomes of different strains of a given organism are compared, whole genome resequencing data are typically aligned to an established reference sequence. However, when the reference differs in significant structural ways from the individuals under study, the analysis is often incomplete or inaccurate. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Philippines | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 254 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 64 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 54 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 17% |
| Unknown | 51 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 150 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | <1% |
| Chemistry | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,655,933
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,104
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,619
of 368,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#52
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.