↓ Skip to main content

The impact of antiretroviral therapy on iron homeostasis and inflammation markers in HIV-infected patients with mild anemia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of antiretroviral therapy on iron homeostasis and inflammation markers in HIV-infected patients with mild anemia
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12967-017-1358-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugenia Quiros-Roldan, Francesco Castelli, Paola Lanza, Chiara Pezzoli, Marika Vezzoli, Inflammation in HIV Study Group, Giorgio Biasiotto, Isabella Zanella

Abstract

Anemia is frequent during HIV infection and is predictive of mortality. Although cART has demonstrated to reduce its prevalence, several patients still experience unresolved anemia. We aimed to characterize iron homeostasis and inflammation in HIV-infected individuals with mild anemia in relation to cART. In this retrospective cohort study, HIV-infected patients with mild anemia, CD4+ cells > 200/mm3 at baseline, maintaining virological response for 12 months after cART starting were selected within the Standardized Management of Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort (MASTER) cohort. Several inflammation and immune activation markers and iron homeostasis indexes were measured in stored samples, obtained at cART initiation (T0) and 12 months later (T1). Patients were grouped on the basis of hemoglobin values at T1: group A (> 13 g/dl) and B (< 13 g/dl). Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare biomarker values. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for all variables. cART improved CD4+ and CD8+ cell counts and their ratio, but this effect was significant only in group A. Only these patients had mild iron deficiency at T0 and showed higher transferrin and lower percentage of transferrin saturation than patients of group B, but differences disappeared with cART. cART decreased inflammation in all patients, but group B had higher levels of all markers than group A, reaching statistical significance only for IL-8 values at T1 (16 vs 2.9 pg/ml; p = 0.017). Hepcidin and IL-6 levels did not show significant differences between groups. Hemoglobin levels both at T0 and T1 did not correlate with any marker. Baseline mild anemia in HIV-infected patients cannot always be resolved with durable efficient cART, possibly due to residual inflammation or immune activation rather than unbalanced iron homeostasis. Further research is needed on cytokine profiling to understand the mechanisms that induce anemia in HIV with suppressive cART.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2017.
All research outputs
#15,486,175
of 23,012,811 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,258
of 4,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,102
of 440,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#42
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,012,811 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.