↓ Skip to main content

Retrospective review of safety and efficacy of programmed cell death-1 inhibitors in refractory high grade gliomas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retrospective review of safety and efficacy of programmed cell death-1 inhibitors in refractory high grade gliomas
Published in
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40425-017-0302-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha N. Reiss, Prakirthi Yerram, Lisa Modelevsky, Christian Grommes

Abstract

Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression has been reported in up to 61% of high grade gliomas (HGG). The purpose of this study was to describe safety and efficacy of PD-1 inhibition in patients with refractory HGGs. This Institutional Review Board approved single center retrospective study included adult patients with pathologically confirmed HGG who received a PD-1 inhibitor from 9/2014-10/2016 outside of a clinical trial at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Twenty five HGG patients received pembrolizumab as part of a compassionate use program. Median age was 50 years (range 30-72); 44% were men; 13 had glioblastoma (52%), 7 anaplastic astrocytoma (28%), 2 anaplastic oligodendroglioma (8%), 2 unspecified HGG (8%), and 1 gliosarcoma (4%). Median prior lines of treatments were 4 (range 1-9). Nineteen (76%) previously failed bevacizumab. Median KPS was 80 (range 50-100). Concurrent treatment included bevacizumab in 17 (68%) or bevacizumab and temozolomide in 2 (8%) patients. Median number of doses administered was 3 (range 1-14). Outcomes were assessed in 24 patients. PD-1 inhibitor related adverse events included LFT elevations, hypothyroidism, diarrhea, myalgias/arthralgias, and rash. Best radiographic response was partial response (n = 2), stable disease (n = 5), and progressive disease (n = 17). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 1.4 months (range 0.2-9.4) and median overall survival (OS) was 4 months (range 0.5-13.8). Three-month PFS was 12% and 6-month OS was 28%. While response rates are low, a few patients had a prolonged PFS. Pembrolizumab was tolerated with few serious toxicities, even in patients receiving concomitant therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 15%
Neuroscience 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#6,446,325
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#1,538
of 3,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,896
of 447,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#28
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.