↓ Skip to main content

The intriguing relationship between the ABO blood group, cardiovascular disease, and cancer

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The intriguing relationship between the ABO blood group, cardiovascular disease, and cancer
Published in
BMC Medicine, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12916-014-0250-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo Franchini, Giuseppe Lippi

Abstract

Other than being present at the surface of red blood cells, the antigens of the ABO blood group system are efficiently expressed by a variety of human cells and tissues. Several studies recently described the involvement of the ABO blood group in the pathogenesis of many human disorders, including cardiovascular disease and cancer, so that its clinical significance extends now beyond the traditional boundaries of transfusion medicine. In a large cohort study recently published in BMC Medicine and including over 50,000 subjects, Etemadi and colleagues reported that nearly 6% of total deaths and as many as 9% of cardiovascular deaths could be attributed to having non-O blood groups, a condition that was also found to be associated with increased risk of gastric cancer. In this commentary, the clinical implications of ABO blood groups are critically discussed and a possible common pathogenic mechanism involving the von Willebrand factor is described.Please see related article http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-014-0237-8.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Qatar 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 82 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 27 31%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 22 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,341,085
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#939
of 4,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,036
of 360,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#18
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,004 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.