↓ Skip to main content

Systems healthcare: a holistic paradigm for tomorrow

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systems healthcare: a holistic paradigm for tomorrow
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12918-017-0521-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo S. Fiandaca, Mark Mapstone, Elenora Connors, Mireille Jacobson, Edwin S. Monuki, Shaista Malik, Fabio Macciardi, Howard J. Federoff

Abstract

Systems healthcare is a holistic approach to health premised on systems biology and medicine. The approach integrates data from molecules, cells, organs, the individual, families, communities, and the natural and man-made environment. Both extrinsic and intrinsic influences constantly challenge the biological networks associated with wellness. Such influences may dysregulate networks and allow pathobiology to evolve, resulting in early clinical presentation that requires astute assessment and timely intervention for successful mitigation. Herein, we describe the components of relevant biological systems and the nature of progression from at-risk to manifest disease. We illustrate the systems approach by examining two relevant clinical examples: Alzheimer's and cardiovascular diseases. The implications of systems healthcare management are examined through the lens of economics, ethics, policy and the law. Finally, we propose the need to develop new educational paradigms to enhance the training of the health professional in an era of systems medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 38 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Psychology 7 6%
Computer Science 7 6%
Other 28 24%
Unknown 41 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,755,290
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#313
of 1,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,017
of 443,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,139 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.