You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Necessary additional steps in ultrasound guided central venous catheter placement: getting to the heart of the matter
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, December 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-017-1900-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thei S. Steenvoorden, Jasper M. Smit, Mark E. Haaksma, Pieter R. Tuinman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 8 | 15% |
Mexico | 5 | 9% |
Colombia | 4 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
United States | 4 | 7% |
Thailand | 1 | 2% |
New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
Singapore | 1 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 9% |
Unknown | 20 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 42 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 13% |
Scientists | 3 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 24% |
Student > Master | 3 | 18% |
Researcher | 3 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 65% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,349,217
of 25,362,278 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,167
of 6,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,512
of 447,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#41
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.