You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Balancing the personal, local, institutional, and global: multiple case study and multidimensional scaling analysis of African experiences in addressing complexity and political economy in health research capacity strengthening
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4505-13-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alastair Ager, Christina Zarowsky |
| Abstract |
Strengthening health research capacity in low- and middle-income countries remains a major policy goal. The Health Research Capacity Strengthening (HRCS) Global Learning (HGL) program of work documented experiences of HRCS across sub-Saharan Africa. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Senegal | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Scientists | 3 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 29 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,511,605
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#497
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,090
of 364,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#10
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.