You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
VizBin - an application for reference-independent visualization and human-augmented binning of metagenomic data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-014-0066-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cedric C Laczny, Tomasz Sternal, Valentin Plugaru, Piotr Gawron, Arash Atashpendar, Houry Hera Margossian, Sergio Coronado, Laurens van der Maaten, Nikos Vlassis, Paul Wilmes |
| Abstract |
Metagenomics is limited in its ability to link distinct microbial populations to genetic potential due to a current lack of representative isolate genome sequences. Reference-independent approaches, which exploit for example inherent genomic signatures for the clustering of metagenomic fragments (binning), offer the prospect to resolve and reconstruct population-level genomic complements without the need for prior knowledge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 23% |
| Luxembourg | 2 | 8% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 16 | 62% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 256 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 28% |
| Researcher | 51 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 107 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Unknown | 54 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,319,852
of 24,562,945 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#914
of 1,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,687
of 361,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,562,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.