↓ Skip to main content

Dietary animal and plant protein intakes and their associations with obesity and cardio-metabolic indicators in European adolescents: the HELENA cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary animal and plant protein intakes and their associations with obesity and cardio-metabolic indicators in European adolescents: the HELENA cross-sectional study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-14-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Lin, Theodora Mouratidou, Carine Vereecken, Mathilde Kersting, Selin Bolca, Augusto César F de Moraes, Magdalena Cuenca-García, Luis A Moreno, Marcela González-Gross, Jara Valtueña, Idoia Labayen, Evangelia Grammatikaki, Lena Hallstrom, Catherine Leclercq, Marika Ferrari, Frederic Gottrand, Laurent Beghin, Yannis Manios, Charlene Ottevaere, Herman Van Oyen, Denes Molnar, Anthony Kafatos, Kurt Widhalm, Sonia Gómez-Martinez, Ligia Esperanza Díaz Prieto, Stefaan De Henauw, Inge Huybrechts

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that dietary protein might play a beneficial role in combating obesity and its related chronic diseases. Total, animal and plant protein intakes and their associations with anthropometry and serum biomarkers in European adolescents using one standardised methodology across European countries are not well documented.Objectives: To evaluate total, animal and plant protein intakes in European adolescents stratified by gender and age, and to investigate their associations with cardio-metabolic indicators (anthropometry and biomarkers).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 175 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 37 21%
Student > Master 24 13%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 32 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Sports and Recreations 6 3%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 43 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2021.
All research outputs
#548,958
of 17,956,456 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#177
of 1,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,457
of 298,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,956,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them