↓ Skip to main content

Dietary animal and plant protein intakes and their associations with obesity and cardio-metabolic indicators in European adolescents: the HELENA cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary animal and plant protein intakes and their associations with obesity and cardio-metabolic indicators in European adolescents: the HELENA cross-sectional study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-14-10
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Lin, Theodora Mouratidou, Carine Vereecken, Mathilde Kersting, Selin Bolca, Augusto César F de Moraes, Magdalena Cuenca-García, Luis A Moreno, Marcela González-Gross, Jara Valtueña, Idoia Labayen, Evangelia Grammatikaki, Lena Hallstrom, Catherine Leclercq, Marika Ferrari, Frederic Gottrand, Laurent Beghin, Yannis Manios, Charlene Ottevaere, Herman Van Oyen, Denes Molnar, Anthony Kafatos, Kurt Widhalm, Sonia Gómez-Martinez, Ligia Esperanza Díaz Prieto, Stefaan De Henauw, Inge Huybrechts, On behalf of the HELENA study group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Unknown 263 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 17%
Student > Master 33 12%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 78 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Sports and Recreations 9 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 96 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#796,062
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#239
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,262
of 363,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#9
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.