↓ Skip to main content

Maternal immunity enhances Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaevaccination induced cell-mediated immune responses in piglets

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal immunity enhances Mycoplasma hyopneumoniaevaccination induced cell-mediated immune responses in piglets
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, June 2014
DOI 10.1186/1746-6148-10-124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meggan Bandrick, Kara Theis, Thomas W Molitor

Abstract

Passively acquired maternal derived immunity (MDI) is a double-edged sword. Maternal derived antibody-mediated immunity (AMI) and cell-mediated immunity (CMI) are critical immediate defenses for the neonate; however, MDI may interfere with the induction of active immunity in the neonate, i.e. passive interference. The effect of antigen-specific MDI on vaccine-induced AMI and CMI responses to Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (M. hyopneumoniae) was assessed in neonatal piglets. To determine whether CMI and AMI responses could be induced in piglets with MDI, piglets with high and low levels of maternal M. hyopneumoniae-specific immunity were vaccinated against M. hyopneumoniae at 7 d of age. Piglet M. hyopneumoniae-specific antibody, lymphoproliferation, and delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) responses were measured 7 d and 14 d post vaccination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 56 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 31%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 17 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 10 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,597,705
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#342
of 3,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,578
of 228,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#6
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.