You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Extracorporeal life support as bridge to lung transplantation: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-014-0686-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Davide Chiumello, Silvia Coppola, Sara Froio, Andrea Colombo, Lorenzo Del Sorbo |
| Abstract |
Patients with acute respiratory failure requiring respiratory support with invasive mechanical ventilation while awaiting lung transplantation are at a high risk of death. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been proposed as an alternative bridging strategy to mechanical ventilation. The aim of this study was to assess the current evidence regarding how the ECMO bridge influences patients' survival and length of hospital stay. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Greece | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 14% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 120 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 23% |
| Unknown | 25 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 58% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2016.
All research outputs
#2,190,417
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,937
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,619
of 395,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#143
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.