You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of turmeric (Curcumin) supplementation on cytokine and inflammatory marker responses following 2 hours of endurance cycling
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12970-014-0066-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joseph N Sciberras, Stuart DR Galloway, Anthony Fenech, Godfrey Grech, Claude Farrugia, Deborah Duca, Janet Mifsud |
| Abstract |
Endurance exercise induces IL-6 production from myocytes that is thought to impair intracellular defence mechanisms. Curcumin inhibits NF-κB and activator protein 1, responsible for cytokine transcription, in cell lines. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of curcumin supplementation on the cytokine and stress responses following 2 h of cycling. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 20% |
| United States | 3 | 12% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Jamaica | 1 | 4% |
| Guinea | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 12% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 20% |
| Scientists | 4 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 194 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 37 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 52 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 26 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 61 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,316,037
of 24,991,957 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#306
of 936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,181
of 436,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
#288
of 849 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,991,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 849 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.