↓ Skip to main content

Stage of HIV presentation at initial clinic visit following a community-based HIV testing campaign in rural Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stage of HIV presentation at initial clinic visit following a community-based HIV testing campaign in rural Kenya
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1367-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Haskew, Kenrick Turner, Gunnar Rø, Andrew Ho, Davies Kimanga, Shahnaaz Sharif

Abstract

BackgroundThe Kenyan Ministry of Health and partners implemented a community-based integrated prevention campaign (IPC) in Western Kenya in 2008. The aim of this study was to determine whether the IPC, compared to Voluntary Counselling and Testing (VCT) services, was able to identify HIV positive individuals earlier in the clinical course of HIV infection following testing.MethodsA total of 1,752 adults aged over 15 years who tested HIV positive through VCT services or the IPC, and subsequently registered at initial clinic visit between September 2008 and September 2010, were considered in the analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed to assess the association of CD4 count and WHO clinical stage of HIV infection at first clinic appointment with age group, gender, marital status and HIV testing source.ResultsMale gender and marital status were independently associated with late HIV presentation (WHO clinical stage 3 or 4 or CD4 count ¿350 cells/¿l) at initial clinic visit. Patients testing HIV positive during the IPC had significantly higher mean CD4 count at initial clinic visit compared to individuals who tested HIV positive via VCT services. Patients testing HIV positive during the IPC had more than two times higher odds of presenting early with CD4 count greater than 350 cells/¿l (adjusted OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.28 ¿ 3.61, p = 0.004) and presenting early with WHO clinical stage 1 or 2 of HIV infection (adjusted OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.24 ¿ 4.60, p = 0.01) at initial clinic visit compared to individuals who tested HIV positive via VCT services.ConclusionThe community-based integrated prevention campaign identified HIV positive individuals earlier in the course of HIV infection, compared to Voluntary Counselling and Testing services. Community-based campaigns, such as the IPC, may be able to assist countries to achieve earlier testing and initiation of ART in the course of HIV infection. Improving referral mechanisms and strengthening linkages between HIV testing and treatment services remain a challenge and electronic medical record (EMR) systems may support monitoring of patients throughout the HIV care and treatment continuum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 86 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 24%
Student > Master 19 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 17%
Psychology 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,389,490
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,842
of 14,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,860
of 351,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#202
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.