↓ Skip to main content

Is the volume of a pleural effusion predictable using the thickness of the pleural lamella measured by sonography as a reference?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is the volume of a pleural effusion predictable using the thickness of the pleural lamella measured by sonography as a reference?
Published in
Critical Care, March 2000
DOI 10.1186/cc724
Authors

M Cardon, N Müller, M Van de Velde, J Ghekiere, K Vandevelde, L Steyaert, E Vandermeersch, M Bourgeois

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,722,652
of 12,357,782 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,137
of 3,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,555
of 350,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#105
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,357,782 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.