You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The need for patient‐focused therapy for children and teenagers with allergic rhinitis: a case‐based review of current European practice
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Translational Allergy, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13601-014-0044-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexandra F Santos, Luis Miguel Borrego, Giuseppina Rotiroti, Glenis Scadding, Graham Roberts |
Abstract |
Allergic rhinitis is a common problem in childhood and adolescence, with a negative impact on the quality of life of patients and their families. The treatment modalities for allergic rhinitis include allergen avoidance, anti-inflammatory symptomatic treatment and allergen specific immunotherapy. In this review, four cases of children with allergic rhinitis are presented to illustrate how the recently published EAACI Guidelines on Pediatric Allergic Rhinitis can be implemented in clinical practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
Taiwan | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Andorra | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 18% |
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Librarian | 3 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 21% |
Unknown | 4 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 54% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,420,474
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#344
of 756 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,444
of 359,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Allergy
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 756 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.