You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Medicinal use of wild fauna by mestizo communities living near San Guillermo Biosphere Reserve (San Juan, Argentina)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4269-11-15 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jorge Hernandez, Claudia M Campos, Carlos E Borghi |
Abstract |
Wild and domestic animals and their by-products are important ingredients in the preparation of curative, protective and preventive medicines. Despite the medicinal use of animals worldwide, this topic has received less attention than the use of medicinal plants. This study assessed the medicinal use of animals by mestizo communities living near San Guillermo MaB Reserve by addressing the following questions: What animal species and body parts are used? What ailments or diseases are treated with remedies from these species? To what extent do mestizo people use animals as a source of medicine? Is the use related to people's age? |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 2 | 2% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 98 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 14% |
Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Professor | 9 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
Other | 21 | 21% |
Unknown | 27 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 31% |
Environmental Science | 15 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Unknown | 36 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2015.
All research outputs
#4,169,227
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#144
of 733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,113
of 351,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.