↓ Skip to main content

Aldosterone synthase inhibition: cardiorenal protection in animal disease models and translation of hormonal effects to human subjects

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aldosterone synthase inhibition: cardiorenal protection in animal disease models and translation of hormonal effects to human subjects
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12967-014-0340-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joël Ménard, Dean F Rigel, Catherine Watson, Arco Y Jeng, Fumin Fu, Michael Beil, Jing Liu, Wei Chen, Chii-Whei Hu, Jennifer Leung-Chu, Daniel LaSala, Guiqing Liang, Sam Rebello, Yiming Zhang, William P Dole

Abstract

BackgroundAldosterone synthase inhibition provides the potential to attenuate both the mineralocorticoid receptor-dependent and independent actions of aldosterone. In vitro studies with recombinant human enzymes showed LCI699 to be a potent, reversible, competitive inhibitor of aldosterone synthase (K i¿=¿1.4¿±¿0.2 nmol/L in humans) with relative selectivity over 11ß-hydroxylase.MethodsHormonal effects of orally administered LCI699 were examined in rat and monkey in vivo models of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and angiotensin-II-stimulated aldosterone release, and were compared with the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist eplerenone in a randomized, placebo-controlled study conducted in 99 healthy human subjects. The effects of LCI699 and eplerenone on cardiac and renal sequelae of aldosterone excess were investigated in a double-transgenic rat (dTGR) model overexpressing human renin and angiotensinogen.ResultsRat and monkey in vivo models of stimulated aldosterone release predicted human dose¿ and exposure¿response relationships, but overestimated the selectivity of LCI699 in humans. In the dTGR model, LCI699 dose-dependently blocked increases in aldosterone, prevented development of cardiac and renal functional abnormalities independent of blood pressure changes, and prolonged survival. Eplerenone prolonged survival to a similar extent, but was less effective in preventing cardiac and renal damage. In healthy human subjects, LCI699 0.5 mg selectively reduced plasma and 24 h urinary aldosterone by 49¿±¿3% and 39¿±¿6% respectively (Day 1, mean¿±¿SEM; P¿<¿0.001 vs placebo), which was associated with natriuresis and an increase in plasma renin activity. Doses of LCI699 greater than 1 mg inhibited basal and ACTH-stimulated cortisol. Eplerenone 100 mg increased plasma and 24 h urinary aldosterone while stimulating natriuresis and increasing renin activity. In contrast to eplerenone, LCI699 increased the aldosterone precursor 11-deoxycorticosterone and urinary potassium excretion.ConclusionsThese results provide new insights into the cardiac and renal effects of inhibiting aldosterone synthase in experimental models and translation of the hormonal effects to humans. Selective inhibition of aldosterone synthase appears to be a promising approach to treat diseases associated with aldosterone excess.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 18 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,390,814
of 22,780,165 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,943
of 3,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,605
of 361,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#84
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.