↓ Skip to main content

Health adaptation policy for climate vulnerable groups: a ‘critical computational linguistics’ analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health adaptation policy for climate vulnerable groups: a ‘critical computational linguistics’ analysis
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1235
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bastian M Seidel, Erica Bell

Abstract

Many countries are developing or reviewing national adaptation policy for climate change but the extent to which these meet the health needs of vulnerable groups has not been assessed. This study examines the adequacy of such policies for nine known climate-vulnerable groups: people with mental health conditions, Aboriginal people, culturally and linguistically diverse groups, aged people, people with disabilities, rural communities, children, women, and socioeconomically disadvantaged people.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 22%
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 16%
Social Sciences 15 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 12%
Psychology 13 12%
Environmental Science 6 5%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2019.
All research outputs
#16,408,793
of 25,905,864 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,503
of 17,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,048
of 371,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#165
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,905,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.