↓ Skip to main content

Understanding how colorectal units achieve short length of stay: an interview survey among representative hospitals in England

Overview of attention for article published in Patient Safety in Surgery, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding how colorectal units achieve short length of stay: an interview survey among representative hospitals in England
Published in
Patient Safety in Surgery, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13037-014-0050-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ben E Byrne, Anna Pinto, Paul Aylin, Alex Bottle, Omar D Faiz, Charles A Vincent

Abstract

Wide variation in the outcomes of colorectal surgery persists, despite a well-established evidence-base to inform clinical practice. This variation may be attributed to differences in quality of care, but we do not know what this means in practical terms of care delivery. This telephone interview study aimed to identify distinguishing characteristics in the organisation of care among colorectal units with the best length of stay results in England.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Other 4 11%
Lecturer 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 10 26%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Psychology 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,660,197
of 8,614,918 outputs
Outputs from Patient Safety in Surgery
#53
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,062
of 244,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient Safety in Surgery
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,614,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 56th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.