You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
ProLoc-GO: Utilizing informative Gene Ontology terms for sequence-based prediction of protein subcellular localization
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2105-9-80 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wen-Lin Huang, Chun-Wei Tung, Shih-Wen Ho, Shiow-Fen Hwang, Shinn-Ying Ho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
Poland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 56 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
Researcher | 10 | 16% |
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
Professor | 5 | 8% |
Other | 11 | 18% |
Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 23% |
Computer Science | 12 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 8% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 15% |
Unknown | 13 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,543,662
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#3,041
of 7,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,227
of 157,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#16
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.