↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative analysis of differences in copy numbers using read depth obtained from PCR-enriched samples and controls

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative analysis of differences in copy numbers using read depth obtained from PCR-enriched samples and controls
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12859-014-0428-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Reinecke, Ravi Vijaya Satya, John DiCarlo

Abstract

BackgroundNext-generation sequencing (NGS) is rapidly becoming common practice in clinical diagnostics and cancer research. In addition to the detection of single nucleotide variants (SNVs), information on copy number variants (CNVs) is of great interest. Several algorithms exist to detect CNVs by analyzing whole genome sequencing data or data from samples enriched by hybridization-capture. PCR-enriched amplicon-sequencing data have special characteristics that have been taken into account by only one publicly available algorithm so far.ResultsWe describe a new algorithm named quandico to detect copy number differences based on NGS data generated following PCR-enrichment. A weighted t-test statistic was applied to calculate probabilities (p-values) of copy number changes. We assessed the performance of the method using sequencing reads generated from reference DNA with known CNVs, and we were able to detect these variants with 98.6% sensitivity and 98.5% specificity which is significantly better than another recently described method for amplicon sequencing. The source code (R-package) of quandico is licensed under the GPLv3 and it is available at https://github.com/reineckef/quandico.ConclusionWe demonstrated that our new algorithm is suitable to call copy number changes using data from PCR-enriched samples with high sensitivity and specificity even for single copy differences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 40 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 26%
Computer Science 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 2 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,563,156
of 23,646,998 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,449
of 7,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,350
of 356,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#42
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,646,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.