You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Satisfaction of doctors with their training: evidence from UK
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-017-2792-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon Gregory, Chiara Demartini |
| Abstract |
This study considers the primary training environment factors affecting the satisfaction of doctors in training with their training. An OLS multiple regression analysis was performed on responses given by doctors in training (trainees) to General Medical Council (UK) National Trainee Survey annually from 2012 to 2015. Two different research models investigate the determinant of trainee doctor satisfaction. The first model includes clinical supervision, feedback, workload, and gender as explanatory variables. The second model adds supportive environment to the first model. The GMC survey response rate is 97%. Our analysis shows the key factors that determine trainee satisfaction are strong clinical supervision, frequent and useful feedback meetings, an adequate workload and a supportive environment. It is suggested focus on clinical supervision, feedback, workload and supportive environment would increase trainee satisfaction, improve the quality of training and morale, and hopefully, therefore, the quality of care patients receive. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 15 | 44% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 85% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,682,640
of 25,217,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#566
of 8,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,886
of 454,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#15
of 172 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,217,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 172 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.