↓ Skip to main content

Various Wolbachia genotypes differently influence host Drosophila dopamine metabolism and survival under heat stress conditions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Various Wolbachia genotypes differently influence host Drosophila dopamine metabolism and survival under heat stress conditions
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12862-017-1104-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nataly Е. Gruntenko, Yury Yu. Ilinsky, Natalya V. Adonyeva, Elena V. Burdina, Roman A. Bykov, Petr N. Menshanov, Inga Yu. Rauschenbach

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Master 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 24%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 26 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,055,192
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,518
of 3,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,694
of 455,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#56
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.