You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gateways to the FANTOM5 promoter level mammalian expression atlas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-014-0560-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marina Lizio, Jayson Harshbarger, Hisashi Shimoji, Jessica Severin, Takeya Kasukawa, Serkan Sahin, Imad Abugessaisa, Shiro Fukuda, Fumi Hori, Sachi Ishikawa-Kato, Christopher J Mungall, Erik Arner, J Kenneth Baillie, Nicolas Bertin, Hidemasa Bono, Michiel de Hoon, Alexander D Diehl, Emmanuel Dimont, Tom C Freeman, Kaori Fujieda, Winston Hide, Rajaram Kaliyaperumal, Toshiaki Katayama, Timo Lassmann, Terrence F Meehan, Koro Nishikata, Hiromasa Ono, Michael Rehli, Albin Sandelin, Erik A Schultes, Peter AC ‘t Hoen, Zuotian Tatum, Mark Thompson, Tetsuro Toyoda, Derek W Wright, Carsten O Daub, Masayoshi Itoh, Piero Carninci, Yoshihide Hayashizaki, Alistair RR Forrest, Hideya Kawaji, the FANTOM consortium |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Japan | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Denmark | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 17 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 13 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 562 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 545 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 126 | 22% |
| Researcher | 95 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 78 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 38 | 7% |
| Other | 84 | 15% |
| Unknown | 93 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 163 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 151 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 33 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 51 | 9% |
| Unknown | 105 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,028,943
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#728
of 4,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,144
of 365,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#14
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.