↓ Skip to main content

Pancancer analysis of DNA methylation-driven genes using MethylMix

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pancancer analysis of DNA methylation-driven genes using MethylMix
Published in
Genome Biology, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13059-014-0579-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivier Gevaert, Robert Tibshirani, Sylvia K Plevritis

Abstract

Aberrant DNA methylation is an important mechanism that contributes to oncogenesis. Yet, few algorithms exist that exploit this vast dataset to identify hypo- and hyper-methylated genes in cancer. We developed a novel computational algorithm called MethylMix to identify differentially methylated genes that are also predictive of transcription. We apply MethylMix to twelve individual cancer sites, and additionally combine all cancer sites in a pancancer analysis. We discover pancancer hypo- and hyper-methylated genes and identify novel methylation-driven subgroups with clinical implications. MethylMix analysis on combined cancer sites reveals ten pancancer clusters reflecting new similarities across malignantly transformed tissues.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 2 1%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 139 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 29%
Researcher 37 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Student > Master 8 5%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 18%
Computer Science 21 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 11%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 13 9%
Unknown 29 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,190,934
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,822
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,061
of 361,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#36
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.