↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
BMC Evolutionary Biology, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-5-26
Pubmed ID
Authors

Revathi Rajkumar, Jheelam Banerjee, Hima Gunturi, R Trivedi, VK Kashyap

Abstract

Analysis of human complete mitochondrial DNA sequences has largely contributed to resolve phylogenies and antiquity of different lineages belonging to the majorhaplogroups L, N and M (East-Asian lineages). In the absence of whole mtDNA sequence information of M lineages reported in India that exhibits highest diversity within the sub-continent, the present study was undertaken to provide a detailed analysis of this macrohaplogroup to precisely characterize and unravel the intricate phylogeny of the lineages and to establish the antiquity of M lineages in India.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 11%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 20%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 11 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,109,718
of 21,839,802 outputs
Outputs from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#1,298
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,516
of 325,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Evolutionary Biology
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,839,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.