↓ Skip to main content

Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
706 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
908 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2009
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-4-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Michie, Dean Fixsen, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Martin P Eccles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 908 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 10 1%
United States 7 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 877 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 177 19%
Researcher 155 17%
Student > Master 138 15%
Student > Bachelor 55 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 5%
Other 193 21%
Unknown 146 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 184 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 146 16%
Social Sciences 137 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 95 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 3%
Other 142 16%
Unknown 181 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,981,937
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,080
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,538
of 124,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.