You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Specifying and reporting complex behaviour change interventions: the need for a scientific method
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, July 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-4-40 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Susan Michie, Dean Fixsen, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Martin P Eccles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 908 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 10 | 1% |
United States | 7 | <1% |
Portugal | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Australia | 2 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 877 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 177 | 19% |
Researcher | 155 | 17% |
Student > Master | 138 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 55 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 5% |
Other | 193 | 21% |
Unknown | 146 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 184 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 146 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 137 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 95 | 10% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 3% |
Other | 142 | 16% |
Unknown | 181 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#6,981,937
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,080
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,538
of 124,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.