↓ Skip to main content

Testicular self examination among Bahir Dar University students: application of integrated behavioral model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testicular self examination among Bahir Dar University students: application of integrated behavioral model
Published in
BMC Cancer, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12885-017-3935-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hordofa Gutema, Yamrot Debela, Bizuayehu Walle, Kidist Reba, Habtamu Wondiye

Abstract

Though the incidence of Testicular cancer among young is rising, little attention is given to promoting testicular self-examination which is recommended for its early prevention in developing countries. This study aimed to assess testicular self-examination and associated factors among Bahir Dar University students using integrated behavioral model. Cross sectional study was conducted among Bahir Dar University students in September, 2016. Systematic sampling technique was used to select 884 participants. Data was collected using self-administer questionnaire, entered into EPI Data 3.1 and exported to SPSS 21 for analysis. Path analysis was done using STATA 14.2 to check causal effect of integrated behavioral model constructs on testicular self-examination. Internal reliability of the items was checked using Cronbach's alpha. Multivariable linear and Logistic regression were used to predict the role of independent variable on Intention and TSE respectively. Findings with p-value <0.05 at 95% confidence interval were considered as statistically significant in the final model. Only 11.8% of the students practiced testicular self-examination in the previous year. Experiential and Instrumental attitude, Perceived control and Self-efficacy were significantly predicted behavioral intention with β coefficient 0.33, 0.12, -0.08 and 0.36. Students' academic unit [OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15-0.63], educational status of student's father AOR = 2.25; CI: 1.15-4.44] and [AOR = 3.00; CI: 1.36-6.64], Intention [OR = 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.31], Know-how of TSE [OR = 3.35, 95% CI:1.94-5.80] and knowledge [AOR = 3.93; CI: 2.30-6.72] were the significant predictors of testicular self-examination. The finding of path analysis also demonstrated as Experiential and Instrumental attitude, Perceived control and Self-efficacy have significant effect on intention with path coefficient of 0.33, 0.12, -0.07 and 0.36. Intention, Knowledge and Know-how have effect on testicular self-examination with path coefficient of 0.2, 0.36 and 0.22 respectively. Magnitude of testicular self-examination is low among university students and it is a product of the type of the college, family educational status, intention, Know-how and knowledge. So, behavior change communication strategy that focus on these behavioral factors should be designed and implemented to improve students' regular practice of testicular self-examination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Master 5 6%
Researcher 5 6%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 30 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 18%
Unspecified 11 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 9%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 32 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2018.
All research outputs
#20,458,307
of 23,015,156 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#6,530
of 8,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#378,532
of 442,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#165
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,015,156 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,359 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.