↓ Skip to main content

Strategies to reduce hospital 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates for patients with acute myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional and longitudinal survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strategies to reduce hospital 30-day risk-standardized mortality rates for patients with acute myocardial infarction: a cross-sectional and longitudinal survey
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, September 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-14-126
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth H Bradley, Heather Sipsma, Amanda L Brewster, Harlan M Krumholz, Leslie Curry

Abstract

Survival rates after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) vary markedly across U.S. hospitals. Although substantial efforts have been made to improve hospital performance, we lack contemporary evidence about changes in hospital strategies and features of organizational culture that might contribute to reducing hospital AMI mortality rates. We sought to describe current use of several strategies and features of organizational culture linked to AMI mortality in a national sample of hospitals and examine changes in use between 2010 and 2013.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 21%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 18 32%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2015.
All research outputs
#18,391,439
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#1,106
of 1,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,861
of 252,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#26
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,606 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.