↓ Skip to main content

Data sharing in clinical trials – practical guidance on anonymising trial datasets

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
87 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Data sharing in clinical trials – practical guidance on anonymising trial datasets
Published in
Trials, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2382-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catriona Keerie, Christopher Tuck, Garry Milne, Sandra Eldridge, Neil Wright, Steff C. Lewis

Abstract

There is an increasing demand by non-commercial funders that trialists should provide access to trial data once the primary analysis is completed. This has to take into account concerns about identifying individual trial participants, and the legal and regulatory requirements. Using the good practice guideline laid out by the work funded by the Medical Research Council Hubs for Trials Methodology Research (MRC HTMR), we anonymised a dataset from a recently completed trial. Using this example, we present practical guidance on how to anonymise a dataset, and describe rules that could be used on other trial datasets. We describe how these might differ if the trial was to be made freely available to all, or if the data could only be accessed with specific permission and data usage agreements in place. Following the good practice guidelines, we successfully created a controlled access model for trial data sharing. The data were assessed on a case-by-case basis classifying variables as direct, indirect and superfluous identifiers with differing methods of anonymisation assigned depending on the type of identifier. A final dataset was created and checks of the anonymised dataset were applied. Lastly, a procedure for release of the data was implemented to complete the process. We have implemented a practical solution to the data anonymisation process resulting in a bespoke anonymised dataset for a recently completed trial. We have gained useful learnings in terms of efficiency of the process going forward, the need to balance anonymity with data utilisation and future work that should be undertaken.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Other 5 8%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Engineering 4 7%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 16 27%