↓ Skip to main content

Are standard doses of piperacillin sufficient for critically ill patients with augmented creatinine clearance?

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
14 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are standard doses of piperacillin sufficient for critically ill patients with augmented creatinine clearance?
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0750-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew A Udy, Jeffrey Lipman, Paul Jarrett, Kerenaftali Klein, Steven C Wallis, Kashyap Patel, Carl MJ Kirkpatrick, Peter S Kruger, David L Paterson, Michael S Roberts, Jason A Roberts

Abstract

IntroductionThe aim of this study was to explore the impact of augmented creatinine clearance, and differing minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), on piperacillin pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment (time above MIC - fT>MIC), in critically ill septic patients receiving intermittent dosing.MethodsCritically ill patients with sepsis receiving piperacillin-tazobactam 4.5 g intravenously (IV) by intermittent infusion every 6-hours for presumed or confirmed nosocomial infection, without significant renal impairment (defined by a plasma creatinine concentration >171 ¿mol/L or the need for renal replacement therapy), were eligible for enrolment. Over a single dosing interval, blood samples were drawn to determine unbound plasma piperacillin concentrations. Renal function was assessed by a measured creatinine clearance (CLCR, mL/min). A population PK model was constructed, and the probability of target attainment (PTA) for 50% and 100% fT>MIC calculated for varying MIC and CLCR values.ResultsIn total, 48 patients provided data. Increasing CLCR was associated with lower trough plasma piperacillin concentrations (P <0.01), such that with an MIC of 16 mg/L, 100% fT>MIC would only be achieved in one-third (n¿=¿16) of patients. Mean piperacillin clearance was approximately 1.5 fold higher than in healthy volunteers, and correlated with CLCR (r¿=¿0.58, P <0.01). A reduced PTA for all MIC values, when targeting either 50% or 100% fT>MIC, was noted with increasing CLCR measures.ConclusionsStandard intermittent piperacillin-tazobactam dosing is unlikely to achieve optimal piperacillin exposures in a significant proportion of critically ill patients with sepsis, due to elevated drug clearance. These data suggest CLCR can be employed as a useful tool to determine whether piperacillin PK/PD target attainment is likely with a range of MIC values.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 106 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Other 13 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 12%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Other 20 18%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 24%
Engineering 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 26 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,876,145
of 22,780,967 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,685
of 6,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,973
of 387,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#178
of 575 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,780,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 575 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.