↓ Skip to main content

Osteitis of the radius following Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccination at birth: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Osteitis of the radius following Bacillus Calmette–Guérin vaccination at birth: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13256-017-1446-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abdelmoneim E. M. Kheir, Salah A. Ibrahim, Azza Abdelsatir, Mustafa E. Bahar

Abstract

The Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine, which is used for the prevention of tuberculosis, is considered protective against the severe forms of childhood tuberculosis. However, some serious adverse reactions including osteitis of the long bones can occur. We report a case of an 18-month-old Sudanese girl who presented at the age of 3 months with swelling of her left forearm following Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination administered at birth. Radiological and histological investigations confirmed tuberculous osteitis of the distal radius. She responded very well to antituberculous treatment with complete healing at follow-up visits. To the best of our knowledge this is the first case report of osteitis of the radius following Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination described from Sudan. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin osteitis, although rare, should be considered a possible complication of the Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination, and early diagnosis and treatment are essential.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 19%
Other 3 14%
Researcher 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#17,926,658
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#1,926
of 3,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,057
of 323,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#30
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,947 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.