Title |
Trends in the performance of quality indicators for diabetes care in the community and in diabetes-related health status: an Israeli ecological study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Israel Journal of Health Policy Research, January 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13584-018-0206-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ronit Calderon-Margalit, Michal Cohen-Dadi, Dana Opas, Dena H. Jaffe, Jacob Levine, Arie Ben-Yehuda, Ora Paltiel, Orly Manor |
Abstract |
Israel is one of the few countries that have a national program for quality assessment of community healthcare. We aimed to evaluate whether improved performance in diabetes care was associated with improved health of diabetic patients on a national level. We conducted a nationwide ecological study estimating improvements in diabetes-related quality indicators and health outcomes. We estimated both correlations between composite measures of diabetes-related quality indicators and selected outcomes, and assessed through a joinpoint analysis whether trends in selected outcomes changed 4 years after the inception of the national program. Between 2002 and 2010, the prevalence of diabetes in Israeli adults increased from 4.8% to 7.4%. During these years, an improvement was noticed in most quality indicators (from 53% to 75% for the composite score). Declines were noted in rates of blindness, diabetes-related end-stage kidney disease, lower limbs amputations and diabetes-related mortality. Significant accelerations in decline were noted for amputations in men and diabetes-related mortality in both Arab men and women 4 years after the inception of the national program. This study suggests that Israel's national program for quality indicators in diabetes care in the community has probably had a significant impact on the health status of the whole population and may have contributed to narrowing gaps in life expectancy between Israeli Jews and Arabs. Future studies based on individual-level data are needed to confirm these results. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
Student > Master | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 21% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
Psychology | 2 | 7% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 8 | 29% |