↓ Skip to main content

Isotretinoin and psychopathology: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of General Psychiatry, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Isotretinoin and psychopathology: a review
Published in
Annals of General Psychiatry, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/1744-859x-8-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vassilis P Kontaxakis, Demetris Skourides, Panayotis Ferentinos, Beata J Havaki-Kontaxaki, George N Papadimitriou

Abstract

Isotretinoin, a synthetic oral retinoid that is used against severe nodulocystic acne, has been associated with various psychiatric side effects such as depression, suicidality and psychotic symptoms. A great number of reports on its effects have been published since its introduction into the market. However, a causal relationship has not been established and the link between isotretinoin use and psychiatric events remains controversial. The present paper reviews the available evidence regarding the association of isotretinoin and psychiatric side effects. All published material reporting psychiatric side effects following isotretinoin treatment, including case reports, case series, reports from adverse drug event reporting systems, prospective surveys and retrospective case-control studies, are presented. In addition, the neurobiology of the retinoids and possible biological mechanisms that may lead to psychopathology are described.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 99 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 7 7%
Other 22 22%
Unknown 28 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Psychology 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,935,710
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Annals of General Psychiatry
#57
of 548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,331
of 186,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of General Psychiatry
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them