↓ Skip to main content

The prevalence of genome replacement in unisexual salamanders of the genus Ambystoma(Amphibia, Caudata) revealed by nuclear gene genealogy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The prevalence of genome replacement in unisexual salamanders of the genus Ambystoma(Amphibia, Caudata) revealed by nuclear gene genealogy
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2008
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-8-158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ke Bi, James P Bogart, Jinzhong Fu

Abstract

Unisexual salamanders of the genus Ambystoma exemplify the most ancient lineage of unisexual vertebrates and demonstrate an extremely flexible reproductive system. Unisexual Ambystoma interact with and incorporate genomes from two to four sexual species (A. laterale, A. jeffersonianum,A. texanum, and A. tigrinum), to generate more than 20 genome compositions or biotypes. Unisexual ploidy levels range from diploid to pentaploid, but all contain at least one A. laterale (L) genome. Replacement of nuclear genomes might be responsible for the evolutionary longevity of unisexual Ambystoma but direct evidence for the prevalence of genome replacement in natural populations is absent. Two major puzzling questions have remained unanswered over the last few decades: 1) is genome replacement a common reproductive method in various unisexual populations and, 2) is there an ancient "L" genome that persists in various unisexual genome compositions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
Canada 2 3%
Czechia 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 68 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 7 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 6 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,997
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,479
of 96,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.