↓ Skip to main content

Increased enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse from enzyme recycling

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Increased enzymatic hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse from enzyme recycling
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13068-014-0185-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evan Michael Visser, Tiago Ferreira Leal, Maíra Nicolau de Almeida, Valéria Monteze Guimarães

Abstract

Development of efficient methods for production of renewable fuels from lignocellulosic biomass is necessary to maximize yields and reduce operating costs. One of the main challenges to industrial application of the lignocellulosic conversion process is the high costs of cellulolytic enzymes. Recycling of enzymes may present a potential solution to alleviate this problem. In the present study enzymes associated with the insoluble fraction were recycled after enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated sugarcane bagasse, utilizing different processing conditions, enzyme loadings, and solid loadings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Unknown 134 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 19%
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 19%
Engineering 19 14%
Chemical Engineering 13 9%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 25 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,473,828
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#735
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,646
of 359,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#19
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.