↓ Skip to main content

Cervicogenic headache: too important to be left un-diagnosed

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Headache & Pain, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cervicogenic headache: too important to be left un-diagnosed
Published in
Journal of Headache & Pain, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/1129-2377-16-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Torbjørn A Fredriksen, Fabio Antonaci, Ottar Sjaastad

Abstract

A comparison has been made between the cervicogenic headache criteria in the new IHS classification of headaches (3rd edition- beta version) and The Cervicogenic Headache International Study Group's (GHISG) criteria from 1998. In a more recent version, the CHISG criteria consist of 7 different items. While "core cases" of cervicogenic headache (CEH) usually fulfill all 7 criteria, the IHS classification - 3rd edition beta version- fulfills only 3 criteria. Although the new three beta version represents an improvement from the previous one, it does not quite seem to live up to the expectations for a diagnostic system for routine, clinical use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Unknown 146 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 26%
Student > Bachelor 26 18%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Other 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 52 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 34%
Sports and Recreations 7 5%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 25 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2020.
All research outputs
#910,442
of 19,434,371 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Headache & Pain
#78
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,172
of 308,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Headache & Pain
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,434,371 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them